🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an cute little “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but very loyal companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.

Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have become pawns in a struggle between a defunct facility, government authorities and advocacy groups.

But those closest to the whales say the heated controversy over their future often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the caretakers who work with them regularly.

After the federal government blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial facility near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to end their lives unless the authorities funds the cost of keeping them alive. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that request, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and group interactions suggest they are highly cognitive creatures – something one caretaker discovered personally.

Burgess spent several years as a whale caretaker, a role that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the details and unique traits in their characters. She cultivated a particular love for a pair of whales with opposing temperaments.

“One whale chose me. The other demanded work,” she said. “They changed the way I view relationships.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Her relationship with the whales evolved against a background of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her three years at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the facility attributes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say points to the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not open to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the closure. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The facility did not comment to a request for comment, but earlier stated: “The whales … receive far higher quality health care and 24/7 attention than any individual in the Britain, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the park in the spring following the passing of Eos, an sick beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the park suspected details of the incident were disclosed to the media and she was released not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and staff members in despair. She says the park’s warning to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any plans to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “considerable staff”, trucks and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for requests for the whales to be taken immediately from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.

In recent months, the nation’s fisheries minister denied a request to transfer the whales to China.

“To approve the request would have meant a perpetual existence in captivity and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As society, we know that marine mammals belong in the sea, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing approve an relocation that would continue the treatment these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the official’s statements reflect a broader lack of awareness of the realities of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers work to find a resolution, proposals have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A suggested protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received regulatory clearance, has shown to be most controversial. The future site, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Supporters remain positive that it could eventually represent a sustainable resolution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the idea of a protected habitat reflects a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a viable approach in the short term.

The project lead, leader of the sanctuary project, said the location will simulate the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales get from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|